What are the five models of integration discussed by Entwistle?
In discussing models of integrating psychology and Christianity, for instance, Entwistle likens relationships between psychology and Christianity to relationships among nations, and gives innovative labels to the models: enemies, spies, colonialists, neutral parties, and allies.
What is integration according to Entwistle?
Question: According to Entwistle, the Enemies model of integration (Christian Combatants) asserts that: According to Entwistle, the Enemies model of integration (Secular Combatants subtype) asserts that: Answer: Religious worldview cannot achieve its end; it is an enemy to scientific development.
What metaphor does Entwistle employ to describe the neutral parties model?
What metaphor does Entwistle employ to describe the Neutral Parties model? an individual is committed to psychology, but also holds religious beliefs.
What is true of Crabb’s view of the two books God’s word and God’s works )?
What is true of Crabb’s view of the two books (God’s Word and God’s Works)? respect the wishes of the client and not discuss matters of faith.
What does Entwistle say is a main struggle when it comes to understanding human beings?
What does Entwistle say is a main struggle when it comes to understanding human beings? Both good and evil reside in each human heart.
What is colonialist model?
The Colonialist model is intent on proclaiming the superiority of theology over psychology (nearly to the exclusion of psychology, in some cases). The Colonialist model ostensibly recognizes the value of psychology, but it does not typically result in deep engagement with the findings or methods of psychology.
What are the two types of the enemies model?
According to Entwistle, there are two versions of the Enemies model. The Secular combatants are antagonistic toward religious belief, whereas the Christian combatants see psychology as the enemy.
What is the colonialist model?
COLONIALIST MODEL 2 Colonialist Model The colonialist model, according to Entwistle (2015), is a religious system that views psychology as foreign soil, while at the same time believes that there is value in it that can be brought into the church.
What is the rebuilders model?
Rebuilders believe that the psychological landscape needs to be rebuilt on specifically Christian foundations. Once we have a physical or a mental model of something, it will cause us to see that thing through a set of beliefs and assumptions.
What is the main concept of the faithful reading approach in terms of resolving conflict between theology and psychology?
What is the main concept of the faithful reading approach in terms of resolving conflict between theology and psychology? may need to be okay with uncertainty, recognizing the issue may not have a satisfactory answer with the individual’s current conclusions.
What are the two types of the Enemies model?
What does it mean to have a worldview?
A worldview is a way of looking at and explaining life and the world. It serves as a lens through which the world is interpreted. It is a set of beliefs that influences a person’s perspective, values and actions.
What does Entwistle mean by integrative approaches to psychology?
Entwistle (2010) concludes by focusing on both psychological anthropology, which includes biology and behaviorism, as well as theological anthropology that includes humanity’s finiteness, fallenness, and its imago Dei.
Who are some examples of Entwistle’s enemies model?
Freud, Ellis, and Maslow were antagonistic toward religion. As such, they are examples of which subset of Entwistle’s Enemies model? According to Entwistle, Jay Adams and John MacArthur are antagonistic toward psychology. As such, they are examples of which subset of Entwistle’s Enemies model?
Which is position of Entwistle models of integration?
His position now is that clients who enter counseling talking about spiritual issues need to be referred to pastors or religious counselors, while clients that are talking about emotional issues need to be seen by secular counselors. Ellis is now embracing which position of Entwistle’s models of integration?
