What is estoppel in law of contract?

What is estoppel in law of contract?

Introduction. Promissory estoppel is a doctrine in contract law which enforces a promise whether executed as a contract or not. The doctrine seeks to protect the rights of a promisee or aggrieved party against the promisor.

What is the theory of estoppel?

Estoppel is a legal principle that prevents someone from arguing something or asserting a right that contradicts what they previously said or agreed to by law. It is meant to prevent people from being unjustly wronged by the inconsistencies of another person’s words or actions.

What is promissory estoppel example?

Promissory Estoppel Example They agree that the contract would be available when party B moves from Sydney to Melbourne. Y then quits his existing job and moves to Melbourne to start his new job. X however, calls the whole thing off and hires someone else for the position.

What is the rule of promissory estoppel?

Overview. Within contract law, promissory estoppel refers to the doctrine that a party may recover on the basis of a promise made when the party’s reliance on that promise was reasonable, and the party attempting to recover detrimentally relied on the promise.

What are the requirements of estoppel?

One needs only to have regard for the requirements of fault and prejudice, as well as causation, and for the fact that for estoppel to succeed, the reliance on estoppel must be legally permissible. The latter requirement has no equal in the law of delict.

Which is the best definition of the term estoppel?

Definition of estoppel : a legal bar to alleging or denying a fact because of one’s own previous actions or words to the contrary

What do you need to know about an estoppel certificate?

An estoppel certificate provides confirmation by the tenant of the terms of the rental agreement, such as the amount of rent, the amount of security deposit and the expiration of the agreement.

Is the original position a misrepresentation in estoppel?

Note: Traditionally equitable estoppel required that the original position was a misrepresentation which was being denied in the new position. Some jurisdictions retain the requirement of misrepresentation.

How is estoppel different from an action ex delicto?

Fault is not required for an interdict, whereas it is a requirement for an action ex delicto; fault is a requirement for estoppel only in certain cases. Whereas an action ex delicto is aimed at the recovery of damages, estoppel is aimed at the prevention of damage. Is estoppel a rule of the law of evidence? Explain.

Back To Top